News

Actions

Chad Daybell requests to split trial from Lori Vallow's, move to 'no earlier than' October 2023

Chad Daybell
Posted at 3:22 PM, Sep 29, 2022
and last updated 2022-09-29 17:48:57-04

Chad Daybell's attorney filed motions in court this week to sever his trial from Lori Vallow's and to postpone his trial significantly later than the currently scheduled January 2023 date.

Defense Attorney John Prior filed two motions Tuesday — one motion to sever Daybell's trial from Vallow's and one motion to move the start of his trial "several months later than January 2023," and no earlier than October 2023, according to court documents.

Daybell and Vallow are currently set to be tried together beginning January 2023 in Ada County. Daybell's team previously filed to sever the trial into two but the request was denied in March 2022. Prior states in the court filings that the request now comes from a "change in circumstance over the ten months since he last moved to sever" and what Prior said was an application of an "improper legal standard."

Prior argued a joint trial would compromise Daybell's "rights to present a complete defense, to fair and reliable merits phase determination, to an individualized sentencing determination, to confrontation of witnesses, and to due process pursuant to the state and federal constitutions," the document reads.

Related: Judge rules cameras in the courtroom will be banned during Lori Vallow, Chad Daybell trial

In the request, Prior also notes a "heightened reliability required" in death penalty cases. Prosecutors announced their intent to seek the death penalty for both Vallow and Daybell in May 2022.

Chad and Lori Daybell are charged with multiple counts of first-degree murder and conspiracy to commit murder for the deaths of 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow, 16-year-old Tylee Ryan — two of Lori’s kids — and Chad’s first wife, Tammy Daybell.

The prosecutors cited the following reasons why Lori and Chad Daybell are eligible for the death penalty:

  • The alleged murders were “committed for remuneration” (financial gain).
  • The alleged murders were “especially heinous, atrocious, cruel, or manifesting exceptional depravity.”
  • The defendant exhibited “an utter disregard for human life.”
  • The defendant has exhibited “a propensity to commit murder and will probably constitute a continuing threat to society.”

In the request to reschedule the start of Daybell's trial, Prior wrote Daybell has the right to a "meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense" and his team will have additional professional and ethical obligations as it is a death penalty case.

Read both motions here: